PDF

Filter by

Filters
Topic
Reset
Discipline(s)
Reset
Organisation(s)
Reset
Licence
Reset
401 - 413 of 413 results

Enhancing Student Engagement and Belonging through Collaborative Partnership is a Higher Education Authority report prepared by a UCD research team led by Professor Barbara Dooley. The resource provides an evidence-informed framework for strengthening student belonging across Irish higher education institutions. Drawing on staff interviews, Healthy Campus survey responses, and analysis of Healthy Campus and NStEP case studies, it identifies practical approaches to improving student engagement, wellbeing and inclusion.

The report frames belonging as a multidimensional and co-constructed experience shaped by social, academic, personal and environmental factors. It highlights that student belonging is affected not only by relationships and participation, but also by structural issues such as housing, commuting, financial pressure, campus spaces, timetable design and access to supports.

The resource is particularly useful for staff and student partners working on Healthy Campus, student success, student engagement, access, inclusion, mental health promotion, orientation, peer support, student partnership and campus development initiatives.

Purpose of the MTU Student Guidelines
Supports Academic Integrity Principles and MTU’s Academic Integrity Policy by:
1. Explaining what academic integrity is.
2. Helping students avoid bad decisions during assessments.
3. Outlines and signposts supports available across MTU

The resource comprises of a literature review and an executive summary, developed as part of the Maynooth University Leadership and EducAtion Framework (LEAF) initiative. It explores how education frameworks can enhance teaching, learning and curriculum design in higher education, supporting inclusive, sustainable and values-led academic practice.

Academic Integrity Handbook for MTU staff.
Chapters:
1. Upholding Academic Integrity and Preventing Academic Misconduct
2. Detecting Academic Misconduct
3. Dealing with Academic Misconduct

This landscape report provides an overview of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) practice across the higher education sector in Ireland. It draws together publicly available institutional strategies, HEA Performance Framework Agreements 2024–2028, Climate Action Roadmaps and ESD to 2030 progress reports to outline current approaches to embedding ESD.

Structured as a series of institutional case studies, the report highlights how ESD is being addressed across teaching and learning, research, engagement and whole-institution practice, and identifies opportunities for collaboration and shared learning across the sector.

This discussion paper explores how student success in higher education is understood, defined and supported in contemporary Irish and international contexts. It brings together international research, national policy and insights from student focus groups conducted in Ireland in 2025 to examine success beyond traditional metrics such as retention, progression and completion.

The paper presents a holistic and relational view of student success, foregrounding belonging, mattering, agency and wellbeing alongside academic and outcomes-based measures. It situates student success as simultaneously student-defined, institution-enabled and outcomes-oriented, and considers the implications of this framing for teaching, learning, policy and system-level practice.

This report presents findings from the HEA Student Success Survey 2025, capturing how students across Ireland define, experience and achieve success in higher education. Based on responses from over 3,400 students across publicly funded higher education institutions, it provides a national, student-centred perspective on success.

The report explores students’ definitions of success, the supports and enablers that help them thrive, and the barriers that can hinder progress. It highlights the relational and holistic nature of student success, encompassing academic achievement alongside well-being, belonging, personal growth and future readiness.

This document sets out a detailed, values-led framework to support the ethical adoption of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) in teaching and learning across Irish higher education. It builds on the HEA Generative AI Policy Framework by translating high-level principles into concrete provisions to guide institutional policy, governance and educational practice.

The principles address five core areas: academic integrity, equity and inclusion, critical engagement and AI literacy, privacy and data governance, and sustainable pedagogy. Together, they provide institutions with a practical reference for navigating the ethical, pedagogical and organisational challenges associated with generative AI, while safeguarding academic standards, student rights and institutional autonomy.

This policy framework provides national guidance for the responsible and values-based use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) in teaching and learning within Irish higher education. It is designed to support educators, academic leaders and professional staff in making informed decisions about the adoption and integration of gen AI technologies in educational practice.

The framework focuses specifically on teaching and learning, addressing issues such as academic integrity, assessment design, equity and inclusion, AI literacy, privacy and data governance, and sustainable pedagogy. It sets out five core principles to guide institutional policy development and practice, while allowing for local adaptation and institutional autonomy.

This poster offers educators an overview of designing a syllabus on the Canvas learning management system that supports personalised learning pathways. It highlights (1) a gamified pedagogy grounded in gaming principles and (2) adaptive learning strategies using MasteryPaths.

The Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education is a living resource for educators, students, and institutions. It invites reflection and dialogue across thirty statements exploring teaching, ethics, and imagination – helping higher education navigate AI with curiosity, integrity, and humanity.

These presentation slides, developed by Dr Amanda Platt and Colette Murphy (Ulster University) for the Advancing Quality and Leadership in Sustainable Higher Education workshop hosted by the Higher Education Authority (HEA), provide a detailed institutional case study of how Ulster University has systematically embedded Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) across all aspects of academic quality and curriculum design.

The slides outline Ulster’s six-year journey, highlighting strategic milestones including the development of the Integrated Curriculum Design Framework (ICDF), alignment with institutional strategies and sector frameworks such as QAA and Advance HE guidance, and successful accreditation under the SOS-UK Responsible Futures programme. They also illustrate how ESD principles have been built into programme approval, staff development, and quality enhancement processes—ensuring sustainability is embedded as a core academic value. The presentation provides an overview of Ulster’s commitment to collaboration, transparency, and evidence-based practice, offering valuable insights for institutions seeking to align ESD with academic standards, curriculum assurance, and sector quality codes.

These presentation slides, created and delivered by Dr Alex Ryan (Learning Energy) for the Advancing Quality and Leadership in Sustainable Higher Education workshop hosted by the Higher Education Authority (HEA), introduce the principles and practice of Anti-Greenwash Education within the context of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD).

The slides outline findings from the QAA-funded project Students Driving Curriculum Quality for Sustainability and provide a visual summary of how student-led approaches can strengthen transparency, quality, and credibility in sustainability education. They include key concepts, activity prompts, examples of course evaluation frameworks, and student feedback on applying ESD quality principles.

The workshop offered a structured overview of how institutions can embed authentic, evidence-based ESD across courses and policies, connecting workshop learning to wider sector priorities and the Government of Ireland’s ESD to 2030 Strategy.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Commuter students generally found the experience of commuting to be quite negative, with few advantages. Furthermore, they felt their on-campus experience is not designed to facilitate their engagement. Students find that the organisation and delivery of the academic experience does not accommodate their needs, and they have few opportunities to engage with the wider student experience.

In Ireland around 40% of students remain in the family home – with their parents, partner or children – while participating in higher education (HE) and commute to their higher education institution (HEI). In 2024-25, the Technological Higher Education Association, now the Technological Universities Association (TUA) and the N-TUTORR Student Empowerment project leadership team, worked in partnership with Professor Liz Thomas, University of York. This resulted in an innovative project to explore commuter students’ experiences in Irish HEIs, and to consider changes that would improve the experience and outcomes for commuter students.

This Irish study builds on qualitative research undertaken in the UK (Thomas & Jones 2017). This found that commuter students are poorly defined, but self-identified commuters experienced commuting to be more tiring, stressful, and expensive than they imagined. They also reported lower engagement in some elements of the academic experience, and in the enhancement and social domains. Available secondary evidence finds that commuter student status is often correlated with not only poorer engagement but also lower outcomes, such as continuation, completion, attainment, and progression to graduate employment.

The study reported here addressed the following two questions:
i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in technological HEIs in Ireland
ii. How can technological HEIs improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students?

The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven technological HEIs in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Ethical approval was secured from the University of York and participating HEIs.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Commuter students generally found the experience of commuting to be quite negative, with few advantages. Furthermore, they felt their on-campus experience is not designed to facilitate their engagement. Students find that the organisation and delivery of the academic experience does not accommodate their needs, and they have few opportunities to engage with the wider student experience.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room.

The report – Generative AI in Higher Education Teaching and Learning: Sectoral Perspectives – was commissioned as part of the Higher Education Authority’s evidence-led approach to policy development.

The report captures the views of staff, students, and leaders across the Irish higher education system on the opportunities and challenges posed by artificial intelligence.

It brings together insights from ten thematic focus groups and a leadership summit, involving over 80 participants from across Ireland’s higher education institutions, alongside student representatives and sectoral stakeholders.

Contested development is an educational game about urban planning and the environment.
It is designed for use with college students and the public.

Play through stages of the planning process, encounter the real life challenges and solutions faced by teams and try to be first to market!

This resource is for basic introduction team play.

The Higher Education Authority (HEA) is developing a National Professional Recognition Framework for Teaching and Learning to support the recognition of teaching excellence across the sector. The framework builds on the Professional Development Framework (2016) and aims to provide clear, nationally agreed benchmarks for effective teaching practice. It will help inform career development, support institutional processes, and promote a shared understanding of teaching quality in Irish higher education.

This compendium comprehensively brings together the components needed by higher education institutions (HEIs) when developing comprehensive frameworks for managing cases of academic misconduct. It serves as both a practical guide and a reflective resource, aimed at strengthening and promoting a culture of academic integrity.

It is with great pleasure that we present the proceedings from the
“Enhancing Academic Integrity: From Ideas to Action” conference, hosted
by CCT College Dublin on 3rd and 4th September 2024. This collection
represents the culmination of thoughtful discourse, innovative research, and
collaborative spirit that defined our gathering.

The VISIEN Framework Document is a strategic guide for integrating immersive technologies (AR, VR, MR, XR) into higher education. It offers practical guidance on curriculum integration, accessibility, collaboration, skill development, institutional readiness, and more to support transformative teaching, learning, and research.

This resource captures key insights from a full-day workshop held on 8 May 2025, hosted by the Higher Education Authority (HEA) and led by internationally recognised expert Dr Alison Cook-Sather. The event focused on the transformative potential of authentic student-staff partnerships as a strategic approach to advancing student engagement, success, and institutional effectiveness.

Attended by academic staff, institutional leaders, student success professionals, and sector partners from across Ireland, the workshop featured a combination of keynote presentations, lightning talks, and interactive sessions. Through real-world examples and hands-on activities, participants explored how to build meaningful, inclusive, and sustainable collaboration between students and staff.

For the full event schedule and a complete list of lightning talk contributors to this slide deck, visit the workshop schedule.

This strategic report will focus on the global trend towards flexible, hybrid working and its impact for Digital Leadership in Higher Education in Ireland and beyond. We examine the wider implications of hybrid learning and working for Higher Education and situate this current globalised trend in its historical context.

Author

Dr Maren Deepwell is an award-winning independent consultant with organisations and leaders in education and the not-for-profit sector as an executive troubleshooter, strate-gic advisor and coach. Dr Deepwell’s particular expertise lies in authentic leadership and unconventional career development, digital wellbeing and sustainability. From 2012- 2023 Dr Deepwell was the Chief Executive of the Association for Learning Technology, the UK’s leading professional for Learning Technology. In this role Dr Deepwell led the organisation working with 350+ volunteers from across sectors often in collaboration with ILTA, ALT’s counterpart in Ireland.

This report explores the role of micro and digital credentialing in Irish higher education. It addresses the ambiguity around the term ‘microcredential’ and argues for adopting technical standards like Open Badges v3 to establish a clear and interoperable framework.

The report encourages the Irish Technical University sector to recognise a broader spectrum of the student experience beyond traditional academic achievements. It examines emerging technologies for their potential to support flexible, secure learning pathways, ensuring that student skills and achievements are accessible and verifiable. Additionally, the report considers global examples, including initiatives from the European Digital Credentials for Learning, analysing how they can be integrated into the Irish context to support lifelong learning and workforce readiness.

Author

Doug Belshaw, Laura Hilliger, and John Bevan are co-founders of We Are Open Co-op, a collective focused on digital education, open technologies, and community-driven innovation. We Are Open Co-op draws on extensive experience to develop credentialing solutions that support lifelong and broad learning for diverse groups. The co-op is committed to openness, collaboration, and using technology to improve learning opportunities and promote inclusive educational practices.

We Are Open Co-op website: https://weareopen.coop

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This report examines five key topics that are influencing new models of teaching and learning. The 2020 Covid-19 pandemic saw a significant shift to online learning and while this raised the profile of online education, the practice since then has been a return to the on campus model, although this has often led to reports of empty lecture halls as students continue to embrace the flexibility of hybrid models. Since 2022 the advent of Artificial Intelligence, in particular Large Language Models, has led to considerable reflection in higher education on the use of essays and exams in assessment and how to best incorporate these tools into teaching. The impact of these two factors, the pandemic and AI, place Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the position of having to satisfy their current student base, with an economic model largely constructed around the physical campus, while also developing models that will provide robust and flexible models for students in the future.

Author

Martin Weller is Emeritus Professor of Educational Technology, at the Open University. He is the former Chair of the Open Programme, the Open University’s flexible, multidisciplinary degree, and Director of the GO-GN, a global network of Doctoral students in the area of open education. He developed the OU’s first fully online course in 1999, which attracted over 15,000 students annually. He is the author of the books The Digital Scholar, 25 Years of Ed Tech and Metaphors of Ed Tech.

He maintains a popular blog at blog.edtechie.net

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

The horizon-scanning report will provide a critical analysis of extant knowledge related to academic integrity as a commitment to six underpinning values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility and courage (ICAI, 2021), guiding ethical behaviour across the tripartite domains of teaching, research and administration, and as impacted by rapidly evolving digital technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI) tools. It will provide recommendations for university leaders navigating institutional best practice and policy for academic integrity in special reference to higher education’s digital transformation (McGill/JISC, 2023), and as germane to institutional and national strategic priorities for the Irish sector and, its community of technological universities.

Authors

Richard Watermeyer is Professor of Higher Education and Co-Director of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations at the University of Bristol. He is by training and orientation a sociologist of higher education; author of well over 100 academic articles, chapters, books and commissioned reports focused on policy and practice challenges and transformations in higher education; and the recipient of research funding for leadership of 19 (inter)national higher education research studies. Richard’s current research focus is on the sociological analyses of digital disruption in global higher education contexts. In this oeuvre he has acted as the Deputy Director of the (£1m) Digital Futures of Work programme (https://digitalfuturesofwork.com) and led an international research team into the effects of digital transitioning and AI adoption in global higher education. Such work has also featured in such analyses of the impacts of generative AI adoption by UK academic researchers (Watermeyer et al. 2024, forthcoming); in recent keynote addresses to the Research in Distance Education and E-Learning and Academic Practice and Technology conferences; and commentary pieces featured by Nature (https://www. nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00115-7) and the LSE (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2024/01/22/if-generative-ai-is-saving-academics-time-what-are-they-doing-with-it/).

Danielle Guizzo is Associate Professor in Economics Education and staff researcher of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations at the University of Bristol. Her research expertise is on the political economy of higher education and the state of academic labour and knowledge production in the light of technological and economic transformations, using a combination of historical and qualitative methods to understand change. Danielle has authored 25 academic articles, co-edited a book and has written several book chapters, reports, and briefs for policymakers. She was awarded the 2024 Clarence E. Ayres scholar award from the Association for Evolutionary Economics for her research on the ceremonialism of higher education from an economic-institutionalist perspective, and has secured research grants as a P-I on the impact of research assessment tools over economics research (funded by the ESRC Rebuilding Macroeconomics Initiative) and as a co-I on how academics have been using technologies in the Covid pandemic (funded by the Royal Economics Society). Danielle has also acted as a consultant for Brazil’s Ministry of Education on the review of Brazil’s national research assessment, and as an Advisory Board member of the Review of the Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics in the UK.

Lara Dzabolova is a PhD researcher at the School of Education at the University of Bristol. Previously, Lara led the Centre for Sustainable Development within the Department of Innovation at a local university in her hometown. Her work was focused on developing sustainability-centred curriculum and research with UN WTO and UN SDSN through digital learning and communication tools.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

Data-driven decision-making is transforming industries like education, healthcare, and finance by harnessing big data and AI. This report explores the critical shift from traditional decision support to AI-powered automation and highlights how these changes impact organisations and society. The report discusses the technology and skills that are currently driving the digital economy and also attempts to reveal what comes next.

Authors

Dr Andrew Pope is a Senior Lecturer and researcher at Cork University Business School, UCC, where he specialises in design and technology. Andrew is Co-Director of the MSc Design and Development of Digital Business and teaches on the MSc Business Analytics programme in UCC. Andrew is the recipient of both the UCC President’s Award for Teaching Excellence and the Irish Academy of Management’s Outstanding Educator Award. Andrew has over 20 years of research experience, collaborating on publicly and privately funded research projects.

Dr Simon Woodworth is a lecturer in Business Information Systems and a Co-Director of the MSc in Business Analytics. He has 15 years’ industry experience in the telecommunications sector, followed by 20 years as an academic. He is Co-Director of the Health Information Systems Research Centre and Lead Investigator in the The Irish Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research. He teaches technical topics including Python Programming, Software Development and Operations and Mobile Application Development. His research interests are focused on Health Informatics and Cyber Security.

Dr Huanhuan Xiong is a lecturer in Information Systems for Sustainable & Responsible Business, and also a senior researcher in Financial Services Innovation Centre, at university College Cork (UCC), Ireland. Currently she serves as a co-director of the MSc Design and Development of Digital Business postgraduate programme. Since 2020, Dr Huanhuan Xiong is the lead researcher in Financial Service Innovation Centre (FSIC), her research areas include but not limited to: big data analytics, decision making, financial well-being, financial resilience.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This report critically examines how the demographic and socio-economic composition of the current and near-future post-compulsory student community intersect with technological, pedagogical, and governance challenges in higher education.

Author

Peter Bryant is a Professor of Business Education and Associate Dean (Education) at the University of Sydney Business School, Australia. He is an award-winning academic with international expertise in designing and delivering successful strategic educational change in both business and social sciences institutions in Australia and the UK. He has thirty years of teaching and research experience in both the UK and Australia at both vocational and higher education levels, in the areas of higher education strategy, educational innovation, online learning and creative industries management.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This horizon scanning report examines the evolving landscape of academic and institutional integrity in higher education. It traces the historical development of academic and institutional integrity concepts, analyses current international best practices, and forecasts future challenges and opportunities. The report highlights how technological advancements, globalization, and changing educational models have transformed the nature of academic misconduct and institutional responses. Key issues addressed include contract cheating, AI-generated content, and credential fraud. The study synthesizes insights from literature reviews and related documents to provide a comprehensive overview of innovative strategies employed by leading institutions worldwide. These range from integrity-focused curriculum design to generative artificial intelligence.

Authors

Sarah Elaine Eaton is a Professor and research chair at the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary (Canada). She is an award-winning educator, researcher, and leader. She leads transdisciplinary research teams focused on the ethical implications of advanced technology use in educational contexts. Dr. Eaton also holds a concurrent appointment as an Honorary Associate Professor, Deakin University, Australia.

Beatriz Antonieta Moya, Ph.D. in Educational Research from the University of Calgary, specializes in ethics, leadership in higher education, and artificial intelligence. Awarded the 2023 Outstanding Student Award by the European Network for Academic Integrity, her work focuses on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and fostering ethical practices. She has co-authored peer-reviewed publications on academic integrity policy and AI ethics in education and regularly leads workshops and presentations internationally, highlighting her commitment to promoting integrity in higher education through interdisciplinary research and leadership.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

Generative AI (GAI) presents significant challenges and opportunities to the higher education sector, from the threat to academic integrity to the promise of personalised learning at scale. This report focuses on three key areas: the impact of GAI on current teaching and assessment practices, current applications and the shift to more learner- centred approaches; emerging GAI pedagogy, international best practices and early research findings on risks; and GAI and digital transformation, international regulation and the future skills agenda.

Author
Mairéad Pratschke is Visiting Professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Data Science Institute (DSI); and Research Fellow and Advisory Board member at the USA’s National Science Foundation-funded National AI Institute for Adult Education and Online Learning (AI-ALOE). Author of Generative AI and Education (2024), Mairéad has delivered keynote talks on generative AI and education in Ireland, the UK, Canada, the USA, Lebanon, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, South Africa and Singapore.

Author website: https://maireadpratschke.com/

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

The increasing digitalisation of higher education institutions brings with it a range of new opportunities and risks. This report draws on international examples and best practices to synthesise the typical challenges and provide insights into potential solutions. This includes examining existing practices in educational technology acquisition and management within the public education sector, including procurement practices and the shift towards outsourcing and SaaS services. From there new challenges are explored, such as responding to external forces, managing new forms of risk, balancing efficiencies with educational quality, and maintaining diverse educational technology portfolios.

Author

Anne-Marie Scott is an education consultant with international expertise in digital, online, and open education. She was Deputy Provost of Athabasca University (Canada), and previously at the University of Edinburgh (UK) where she led many major digital and open education initiatives. She serves as a member of the Government of British Columbia’s Digital Learning Advisory Committee and is the CFO (Treasurer) of the Open Source Initiative, the non-profit which stewards global definitions of open source software and open source artificial intelligence. She currently teaches critical approaches to educational technology as adjunct faculty at Royal Roads University (Canada).

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

In this report we present a detailed examination of current AI use and considerations for its safe and ethical deployment. We conclude with horizon scanning and recommendations for educational establishments beginning to incorporate AI.

Authors

Dr James Ransom is a higher education specialist whose work looks at how universities can help adapt to and solve challenges facing society, including rapid technological change. He is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow at UCL Institute of Education, Head of Research at the National Centre for Entrepreneurship in Education (NCEE), and a Specialist Advisor on higher education to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Previous work includes projects for the British Council, the Royal Society, and the British Academy, as well as jobs in policy at Universities UK, UNESCO, and the Association of Commonwealth Universities.

Dr Richard Whittle is an expert in the economics of Artificial Intelligence. He researches Artificial Intelligence and Human Decision-Making and has published in world-leading journals such as Work Employment and Society, Public Administration, and the Cambridge Journal of Economics. Richard led the technical research for the Greater Manchester Independent Prosperity Review, and he is an academic advisor to the Manchester Digital Strategy. Richard has received research funding from numerous sources, including the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Research England, and the Money Advice Service, and he has been the recipient of a personal Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) fellowship hosted at the Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose, UCL.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This document provides a summary of the book “MÉTODO DE LOS RELOJES. GRAMÁTICA DESCRIPTIVA DEL ESPAÑOL” authored by Manuel Perez Saiz, which serves as the foundation for the UCC Spanish grammar course.

This report discusses the views of final year students and graduates who attended a TCD led, multi-institutional one-day workshop on what student success means to them, and what they identified as the facilitators of and barriers to achieving that success. The findings were based on the analysis of four types of inputs for the seminar: written submissions by students on the theme prior to the seminar, student talks, a panel discussion and workshop discussions on the day of the seminar. In order to have a framework to discuss the concept at the seminar, a thematic analysis was performed on the written submissions which students submitted prior to the seminar. Three broad categories of success were identified: academic, personal and social. While initially academic success features predominantly, as students progress through their studies, they develop a more holistic perspective where personal and social success become increasingly important to them. Student success is a broad concept. It is different for and personal to each student and changes with the student’s journey from initial entry to college through to graduation.

An experimental ‘eco-film’ workshop for staff and students to acquire skills and deeper knowledge of analogue photochemical film processes in a post-digital era.

Frugal Filmmaking

CC BY-NC

We were both impressed and worried to witness the rapid escalation in the ability of tools like ChatGPT to conjure credible-seeming scholarly prose ex-nihilo. Rather than leaving the assessment strategy in MEEN3010 exposed to AI plagiarism, we decided to shift the focus towards a more authentic and interactive learning activity; a poster session.

Recognizing the transformative potential of AI, the ICDE Quality Network has developed this report as a key initiative to explore its application in teaching and learning globally. This endeavour underscores the Network’s commitment to advancing quality education by promoting the responsible integration of AI.

Y. Mormul, J. Przybyszewski, A. Nakoud and P. Cuffe, “Reliance on Artificial Intelligence Tools May Displace Research Skills Acquisition Within Engineering Doctoral Programmes: Examples and Implications”, presented at IEEE International Conference on IT in Higher Education and Training, Paris, France, November 2024

Publication created by our 2024 summer interns in DkIT.
Stepping out in Dundalk! This book will be a useful resource for our cohort international students someone useful tips on life on and off campus.

Stepping out in Dundalk!

CC BY-NC

This OER is from a collection of ‘MU: UDL & U’ Plus One resources created by Maynooth University colleagues with the support of HEA PATH4 funding.

Publication created by our 2024 summer interns in DkIT.
Giving power back to class reps! This book will be a useful resource for all our student reps to use as a guide and for training purposes also.

We are delighted to welcome you to ‘You can UDL it!’ This collection brings together case studies from educators across DkIT, who have successfully implemented Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in their own practice. UDL provides a framework for making learning, teaching and assessment more inclusive, and helps to support all our learners.

In the denouement of the COVID-19 pandemic, talk of a return to “normalcy” in higher education belies the great challenges and ongoing disruptions that yet lie ahead for many institutions. Public perceptions of the value of postsecondary education continue their downward slide, placing institutions in the position of having to demonstrate their worth and find solutions to declining enrollments. Data and analytics capabilities continue to evolve, introducing new opportunities and new risks to the institution. Chief among these capabilities, generative AI promises to change teaching and learning in ways many of us have yet to fully understand or prepare for.

For this year’s teaching and learning Horizon Report, expert panelists’ discussions highlighted and wrestled with these present and looming challenges for higher education. This report summarizes the results of those discussions and serves as one vantage point on where our future may be headed.

This publication will be a helpful, collaborative resource to all teaching staff at and beyond TUS. It may also generate further ideas for improving practice and enhancing student engagement. This first compendium has led to further publications where ‘pedagogical communities of practice’ continue to share our knowledge.

The OER Recommendation aims to assist Member States to support the development and sharing of openly licensed learning and teaching materials, benefiting students, teachers, and researchers worldwide. It supports the creation, use and adaptation of inclusive and quality OER, and facilitates international cooperation in this field through five Action Areas, namely (i) building the capacity of stakeholders to create, access, re-use, adapt and redistribute OER; (ii) developing supportive policy; (iii) encouraging inclusive and equitable quality OER; (iv) nurturing the creation of sustainability models for OER, and (v) facilitating international cooperation.

The OER Recommendation aims to assist Member States to support the development and sharing of openly licensed learning and teaching materials, benefiting students, teachers, and researchers worldwide. It supports the creation, use and adaptation of inclusive and quality OER, and facilitates international cooperation in this field through five Action Areas, namely (i) building the capacity of stakeholders to create, access, re-use, adapt and redistribute OER; (ii) developing supportive policy; (iii) encouraging inclusive and equitable quality OER; (iv) nurturing the creation of sustainability models for OER, and (v) facilitating international cooperation.

These guides have been prepared by UNESCO, as part of its programme of the support to governments and educational institutions in the implementation of the UNESCO OER Recommendation. They draw heavily on the in-depth background papers prepared by OER experts from around the world in each of the five Action Areas: Prof. Melinda dP. Bandalaria (building the capacity of stakeholders to create, access, re-use, adapt and redistribute OER); Dr Javiera Atenas (developing supportive policy); Dr Ahmed Tlili (encouraging inclusive and equitable quality OER); Dr Tel Amiel (nurturing the creation of sustainability models for OER), and Ms Lisbeth Levey (facilitating international cooperation). We are deeply grateful for their assistance and expert knowledge. Preparation of the text of the final guides was done with support from Neil Butcher and Alison Zimmermann of OER Africa.

The learner population in tertiary education is becoming increasingly diverse, and students’ lives are also increasingly complex. The responsibility on educational institutions to provide equitable access for all is now strongly embedded in Irish legislation, and national tertiary education strategies contain more specific goals to implement a Universal Design approach, (SOLAS, 2020; Higher Education Authority, 2022).

The aim is to move towards a system where ‘Inclusion is Everyone’s Business’, where all staff play their part in delivering an inclusive educational experience.

Universal Design, or UD for short, offers us an evidence-based approach to engender this mindset, and is increasingly seen as a central tenet of our response to rising diversity, (Centre for Excellence in Universal Design, 2022). But how can we embed a UD approach in our institutions?

That’s where ALTITUDE – the National Charter for Universal Design in Tertiary Education – comes in to play.

Funded by the HEA under PATH 4, the ALTITUDE Project is an extensive cross sectoral collaboration involving six national agencies, fifteen higher education (HE) institutions and six Education and Training Board (ETB) representatives, nominated by Directors of FET to represent the Further Education and Training sector.

The vision of the project looks to a future in tertiary education where ‘all learners are transformatively included through universal design in education’, deriving the name ALTITUDE. It seeks to move us in that direction by supporting HEIs and ETBs to make sustainable progress towards systemically embedding a UD approach…. – one which places human diversity at the heart of tertiary education design, and fosters student success for all learners.

The ALTITUDE Charter, and the associated toolkit and technical report, build on significant existing work on UD in the Irish tertiary education landscape (Kelly & Padden, 2018), and through these outputs, provides a clear roadmap for institutions to make progress.

Drawing from national and international literature, the Charter recommends key strategic enablers, which institutions should put in place over time to support the sustainable implementation of UD, and proposes collaborative action to work towards goals under 4 key pillars of our institutions:

– Learning, Teaching & Assessment;
– Supports, Services & Social Engagement;
– the Physical Environment;
– and the Digital Environment

This practitioner guide is designed to offer an overall framework for successfully developing and facilitating group work processes. It guides the novice practitioner through each stage of the process. It signposts associated challenges and provides suggestions for helpful responses.