Teaching for Holistic Sustainable Wellbeing in Higher Education

[favorite_button]

Creator(s) (alphabetical)

Daniel Guigui, Gabriela Martinez Sainz, Jessica Surdey

Organisation(s)

University College Dublin

Discipline(s)

Education

Topic(s)

Assessment and Feedback, Curriculum Design, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), Student Success, Teaching and Learning Practice

License

CC BY

Media Format

PDF

Date Submitted

Submitted by

Export Resource Data

Description

This toolkit is designed to provide educators in Higher Education with practical, adaptable tools and strategies for fostering sustainable wellbeing in their teaching through curriculum, assessment and pedagogy.

Benefit of this resource and how to make the best use of it

The framework and ideas in the toolkit recognise the importance of balancing academic achievement with the holistic development of students, focusing on their physical, mental, emotional, and social wellbeing while fostering among them a sense of planetary stewardship to prepare students for sustainable futures.

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)

This work is licensed under a CC BY license, allowing sharing and adaptation with proper attribution.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
? This citation is automatically generated and may require adjustment. Always verify it against your style guide.
Guigui, D., Sainz, G. M., & Surdey, J. (01/12/2024). Teaching for holistic sustainable wellbeing in higher education. National Resource Hub (Ireland). Retrieved from: https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/resource/teaching-for-holistic-sustainable-wellbeing-in-higher-education/ License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).

Adapting this resource? Share your version!

If you have modified or adopted this resource, share your version here. Tracking adaptations helps us measure impact and connects others with useful updates.

Related OER

Teaching and Assessment for Learning Checklists aimed at early career & seasoned lecturers. The checklists provide guidance & reliable curated resources for lecturers who want to deliver an engaging and positive learning experience for their students. They act as a guide to check existing approaches, and help analyse how improvements can be made.

This open educational resource supports pre-service teachers in developing practical approaches to social justice in Physical Education. Through visual case studies, reflective prompts, and introductory concepts, it encourages critical reflection, collaborative discussion, and informed decision-making based on authentic school placement experiences

The HEA ESD Self-Evaluation Tool is a voluntary, developmental resource that supports higher education institutions in reviewing and strengthening whole-of-institution Education for Sustainable Development. It helps institutions undertake structured reflection on current strengths, gaps and progression, identify local priorities and plan practical next steps.
The tool is organised around the five ESD to 2030 Priority Action Areas. For each area, it provides developmental descriptors across three broad stages of practice: Emerging, Established and Leading. It is intended to support dialogue, planning and quality enhancement.

This resource sets out five strategic enablers that can support the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development across all areas of a higher education institution:

1. Collaboration and commitment
2. Holistic and transformational practice, scholarship and leadership
3. Capacity-building and professional development
4. Student partnership, engagement and leadership
5. Reciprocal learning communities

The Enablers translate national and international ESD commitments into shared language, strategic direction and practical prompts for higher education. They address curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, campus operations, governance, leadership, professional learning, student partnership, research and reciprocal engagement with communities.

The resource is designed to support institutional reflection, planning and enhancement rather than prescribe a single model. It recognises institutional autonomy, diversity of mission and disciplinary differences.