Recognizing the transformative potential of AI, the ICDE Quality Network has developed this report as a key initiative to explore its application in teaching and learning globally. This endeavour underscores the Network’s commitment to advancing quality education by promoting the responsible integration of AI.
Benefit of this resource and how to make the best use of it
In preparing this report, the ICDE Focal Points on Quality have contributed insights on the adoption and implementation of AI in education within their respective institutions and regions. Their analyses encompass various dimensions, including the status of adoption, its impact on educational quality, learner experiences, accessibility, and operational efficiency. Additionally, the contributors have identified good practices, risks, and challenges, offering a comprehensive view of the current landscape.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)
This work is licensed under a CC BY license, allowing sharing and adaptation with proper attribution.
?
This citation is automatically generated and may require adjustment. Always verify it against your style guide.
Barth, D., Ubachs, G., Quezada, M. M., Hassan, M., Inegbedion, O. J., Darojat, O., Chand, R., & Ali, S. A. (2025). Ai in action: global perspectives on the application of ai in education. National Resource Hub (Ireland). Retrieved from: https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/resource/ai-in-action-global-perspectives-on-the-application-of-ai-in-education/ License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
Adapting this resource? Share your version!
If you have modified or adopted this resource, share your version here. Tracking adaptations helps us measure impact and connects others with useful updates.
This report draws on Patricia Gibson’s research around critical approaches to Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education and the increasing automation of Educational Technologies (EdTech).
This resource was created to share the learning from teaching adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) in IADT college as part of a national suite of pilot projects.
Comparing student and educator perceptions of generative artificial intelligence for teaching, learning and assessment: results from two institutional surveys