Reliance on Artificial Intelligence Tools May Displace Research Skills Acquisition Within Engineering Doctoral Programmes: Examples and Implications

Creator(s)

Andrew Nakoud, Jan Przybyszewski, Paul Cuffe, Yevhenii Mormul

Organisation(s)

University College Dublin, University Of California San Diego

Discipline(s)

Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction

Topic(s)

Assessment & Feedback, Curriculum Design, Professional Development, Student Success

License

CC BY-SA

Media Format

PDF, PDF document

Date Submitted

Submitted by

Export Resource Data

Description

Y. Mormul, J. Przybyszewski, A. Nakoud and P. Cuffe, “Reliance on Artificial Intelligence Tools May Displace Research Skills Acquisition Within Engineering Doctoral Programmes: Examples and Implications”, presented at IEEE International Conference on IT in Higher Education and Training, Paris, France, November 2024

Benefit of this resource and how to make the best use of it

The escalation in capabilities of Large Language Models has triggered urgent discussions about their implications for tertiary education, particularly regarding how they might facilitate academic misconduct in graded engineering coursework. However, graduate research education — where a student works closely with a supervisor over years to develop both implicit and explicit research skills — has received comparatively less attention in this discussion. This paper seeks to develop this discourse by presenting targeted case studies that explore the opportunities and threats posed by artificial intelligence to engineering doctoral education. For instance, using a specimen exercise from a PhD-level research skills module, we demonstrate how artificial intelligence tools can now deeply penetrate research workflows in technical computing and scripting. We likewise investigate the capabilities of chatbot tools to assist engineering PhD candidates with the broader research skills central to their training and development. These include writing and proofreading theses and research papers, producing data visualizations, simulating peer review processes, and preparing scientific diagrams. By evaluating the capabilities and limitations of extant artificial intelligence in these areas, we can discuss both the potential benefits and ethical concerns of doctoral students engaging with such assistance.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

This work is licensed under a CC BY-SA license, allowing adaptation and sharing with proper attribution, provided derivative works use the same license.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
? This citation is automatically generated and may not be perfectly formatted. Always check and adjust it according to your required citation style.
Nakoud, A., Przybyszewski, J., Cuffe, P., & Mormul, Y. (2025). Reliance on artificial intelligence tools may displace research skills acquisition within engineering doctoral programmes: examples and implications. National Resource Hub (Ireland). Retrieved from: https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/resource/reliance-on-artificial-intelligence-tools-may-displace-research-skills-acquisition-within-engineering-doctoral-programmes-examples-and-implications/

Adapted this resource? Share your version!

If you have modified or adopted this resource, share your version here. Tracking adaptations helps us measure impact and connects others with useful updates.

Related OER

This open course is designed to facilitate the development of your Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy so that you can explore and innovate using Generative AI (GenAI) within your teaching, learning, and assessment practices.

In light of the potential opportunities and challenges of these technologies, this course will facilitate you in exploring the fundamentals of GenAI and AI Literacy, whilst focusing on an ethical practice. You will consider innovative ways in which you can respond to the challenges arising from the impact of these technologies in Higher Education.

Completion of this course will support you in developing a GenAI teaching strategy to apply to your own practice.

This report discusses the views of final year students and graduates who attended a TCD led, multi-institutional one-day workshop on what student success means to them, and what they identified as the facilitators of and barriers to achieving that success. The findings were based on the analysis of four types of inputs for the seminar: written submissions by students on the theme prior to the seminar, student talks, a panel discussion and workshop discussions on the day of the seminar. In order to have a framework to discuss the concept at the seminar, a thematic analysis was performed on the written submissions which students submitted prior to the seminar. Three broad categories of success were identified: academic, personal and social. While initially academic success features predominantly, as students progress through their studies, they develop a more holistic perspective where personal and social success become increasingly important to them. Student success is a broad concept. It is different for and personal to each student and changes with the student’s journey from initial entry to college through to graduation.

Report an Issue

Name