Teaching and Learning

Filter by

Filters
Topic
Reset
Organisation(s)
Reset
Licence
Reset
Format
Reset
1 - 44 of 44 results

This landscape report provides an overview of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) practice across the higher education sector in Ireland. It draws together publicly available institutional strategies, HEA Performance Framework Agreements 2024–2028, Climate Action Roadmaps and ESD to 2030 progress reports to outline current approaches to embedding ESD.

Structured as a series of institutional case studies, the report highlights how ESD is being addressed across teaching and learning, research, engagement and whole-institution practice, and identifies opportunities for collaboration and shared learning across the sector.

An interactive, beginner-level, asynchronous resource designed to equip students with foundational knowledge on genAI ethics, applications, and academic use. It covers genAI fundamentals, responsible use, academic integrity considerations, and practical scenarios. The primary intended audience is university students.

This discussion paper explores how student success in higher education is understood, defined and supported in contemporary Irish and international contexts. It brings together international research, national policy and insights from student focus groups conducted in Ireland in 2025 to examine success beyond traditional metrics such as retention, progression and completion.

The paper presents a holistic and relational view of student success, foregrounding belonging, mattering, agency and wellbeing alongside academic and outcomes-based measures. It situates student success as simultaneously student-defined, institution-enabled and outcomes-oriented, and considers the implications of this framing for teaching, learning, policy and system-level practice.

This report presents findings from the HEA Student Success Survey 2025, capturing how students across Ireland define, experience and achieve success in higher education. Based on responses from over 3,400 students across publicly funded higher education institutions, it provides a national, student-centred perspective on success.

The report explores students’ definitions of success, the supports and enablers that help them thrive, and the barriers that can hinder progress. It highlights the relational and holistic nature of student success, encompassing academic achievement alongside well-being, belonging, personal growth and future readiness.

Leading Change Together: Case Studies from the Teaching & Learning Conference 2025 is a collection of case studies showcasing practice-led examples from the HEA Teaching & Learning Conference 2025, held under the theme “Leading Change Together: Building the Future of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education”. The resource brings together institutional and practitioner contributions spanning topics such as inclusive learning design, education for sustainable development, professional learning, digital innovation and AI in teaching and learning. It illustrates how collaborative practice across Irish higher education is shaping future-focused approaches to enhancing teaching and learning.

This document sets out a detailed, values-led framework to support the ethical adoption of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) in teaching and learning across Irish higher education. It builds on the HEA Generative AI Policy Framework by translating high-level principles into concrete provisions to guide institutional policy, governance and educational practice.

The principles address five core areas: academic integrity, equity and inclusion, critical engagement and AI literacy, privacy and data governance, and sustainable pedagogy. Together, they provide institutions with a practical reference for navigating the ethical, pedagogical and organisational challenges associated with generative AI, while safeguarding academic standards, student rights and institutional autonomy.

This policy framework provides national guidance for the responsible and values-based use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) in teaching and learning within Irish higher education. It is designed to support educators, academic leaders and professional staff in making informed decisions about the adoption and integration of gen AI technologies in educational practice.

The framework focuses specifically on teaching and learning, addressing issues such as academic integrity, assessment design, equity and inclusion, AI literacy, privacy and data governance, and sustainable pedagogy. It sets out five core principles to guide institutional policy development and practice, while allowing for local adaptation and institutional autonomy.

This lightning talk for NORFest 2025 introduces researchers to the benefits and impact of using OE Practices to disseminate and promote Open Research outputs. It introduces key concepts in open education, and provides practical tips on how to apply OE practices with a focus on reusability; licensing and copyright; and content co-creation.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Commuter students generally found the experience of commuting to be quite negative, with few advantages. Furthermore, they felt their on-campus experience is not designed to facilitate their engagement. Students find that the organisation and delivery of the academic experience does not accommodate their needs, and they have few opportunities to engage with the wider student experience.

In Ireland around 40% of students remain in the family home – with their parents, partner or children – while participating in higher education (HE) and commute to their higher education institution (HEI). In 2024-25, the Technological Higher Education Association, now the Technological Universities Association (TUA) and the N-TUTORR Student Empowerment project leadership team, worked in partnership with Professor Liz Thomas, University of York. This resulted in an innovative project to explore commuter students’ experiences in Irish HEIs, and to consider changes that would improve the experience and outcomes for commuter students.

This Irish study builds on qualitative research undertaken in the UK (Thomas & Jones 2017). This found that commuter students are poorly defined, but self-identified commuters experienced commuting to be more tiring, stressful, and expensive than they imagined. They also reported lower engagement in some elements of the academic experience, and in the enhancement and social domains. Available secondary evidence finds that commuter student status is often correlated with not only poorer engagement but also lower outcomes, such as continuation, completion, attainment, and progression to graduate employment.

The study reported here addressed the following two questions:
i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in technological HEIs in Ireland
ii. How can technological HEIs improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students?

The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven technological HEIs in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Ethical approval was secured from the University of York and participating HEIs.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Commuter students generally found the experience of commuting to be quite negative, with few advantages. Furthermore, they felt their on-campus experience is not designed to facilitate their engagement. Students find that the organisation and delivery of the academic experience does not accommodate their needs, and they have few opportunities to engage with the wider student experience.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room.

The report – Generative AI in Higher Education Teaching and Learning: Sectoral Perspectives – was commissioned as part of the Higher Education Authority’s evidence-led approach to policy development.

The report captures the views of staff, students, and leaders across the Irish higher education system on the opportunities and challenges posed by artificial intelligence.

It brings together insights from ten thematic focus groups and a leadership summit, involving over 80 participants from across Ireland’s higher education institutions, alongside student representatives and sectoral stakeholders.

Generative AI Guidance Microsite provides resources and guidance to staff and students on the appropriate use of Generative AI in teaching and learning at MIC.

This report presents the findings and recommendations of the 2025 Expert Group review of the Irish National Framework for Student Success in Higher Education. Commissioned by the HEA, it explores how the framework and accompanying toolkit have been engaged with across the sector and outlines a renewed vision for student success that is inclusive, strategic, and evidence-informed.

This resource captures insights through zine making from workshop participants at the Education after the algorithm symposium hosted at DCU on 21 February 2025, facilitated by Kate Molloy and Clare Thomson.

Symposium: https://hackthiscourse.com/symposium/?=1#/

Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1TpNdJxnLij-bi8bInJfxJwAegR_JjKVa/edit?

The course is targeted at senior leaders to support the implementation of universal design and the adoption of the national ALTITUDE Charter https://www.mtu.ie/universal-design/ and aims to complement the existing Digital Badge for Universal Design in Teaching & Learning https://www.ahead.ie/udl-digital-badge and the Digital Badge Universal Design Beyond the Classroom https://www.ahead.ie/journal/Launch-Universal-Design-Beyond-the-Classroom-Digital-Course-and-Digital-Badge

This strategic report will focus on the global trend towards flexible, hybrid working and its impact for Digital Leadership in Higher Education in Ireland and beyond. We examine the wider implications of hybrid learning and working for Higher Education and situate this current globalised trend in its historical context.

Author

Dr Maren Deepwell is an award-winning independent consultant with organisations and leaders in education and the not-for-profit sector as an executive troubleshooter, strate-gic advisor and coach. Dr Deepwell’s particular expertise lies in authentic leadership and unconventional career development, digital wellbeing and sustainability. From 2012- 2023 Dr Deepwell was the Chief Executive of the Association for Learning Technology, the UK’s leading professional for Learning Technology. In this role Dr Deepwell led the organisation working with 350+ volunteers from across sectors often in collaboration with ILTA, ALT’s counterpart in Ireland.

This report explores the role of micro and digital credentialing in Irish higher education. It addresses the ambiguity around the term ‘microcredential’ and argues for adopting technical standards like Open Badges v3 to establish a clear and interoperable framework.

The report encourages the Irish Technical University sector to recognise a broader spectrum of the student experience beyond traditional academic achievements. It examines emerging technologies for their potential to support flexible, secure learning pathways, ensuring that student skills and achievements are accessible and verifiable. Additionally, the report considers global examples, including initiatives from the European Digital Credentials for Learning, analysing how they can be integrated into the Irish context to support lifelong learning and workforce readiness.

Author

Doug Belshaw, Laura Hilliger, and John Bevan are co-founders of We Are Open Co-op, a collective focused on digital education, open technologies, and community-driven innovation. We Are Open Co-op draws on extensive experience to develop credentialing solutions that support lifelong and broad learning for diverse groups. The co-op is committed to openness, collaboration, and using technology to improve learning opportunities and promote inclusive educational practices.

We Are Open Co-op website: https://weareopen.coop

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This report examines five key topics that are influencing new models of teaching and learning. The 2020 Covid-19 pandemic saw a significant shift to online learning and while this raised the profile of online education, the practice since then has been a return to the on campus model, although this has often led to reports of empty lecture halls as students continue to embrace the flexibility of hybrid models. Since 2022 the advent of Artificial Intelligence, in particular Large Language Models, has led to considerable reflection in higher education on the use of essays and exams in assessment and how to best incorporate these tools into teaching. The impact of these two factors, the pandemic and AI, place Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the position of having to satisfy their current student base, with an economic model largely constructed around the physical campus, while also developing models that will provide robust and flexible models for students in the future.

Author

Martin Weller is Emeritus Professor of Educational Technology, at the Open University. He is the former Chair of the Open Programme, the Open University’s flexible, multidisciplinary degree, and Director of the GO-GN, a global network of Doctoral students in the area of open education. He developed the OU’s first fully online course in 1999, which attracted over 15,000 students annually. He is the author of the books The Digital Scholar, 25 Years of Ed Tech and Metaphors of Ed Tech.

He maintains a popular blog at blog.edtechie.net

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

The horizon-scanning report will provide a critical analysis of extant knowledge related to academic integrity as a commitment to six underpinning values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility and courage (ICAI, 2021), guiding ethical behaviour across the tripartite domains of teaching, research and administration, and as impacted by rapidly evolving digital technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI) tools. It will provide recommendations for university leaders navigating institutional best practice and policy for academic integrity in special reference to higher education’s digital transformation (McGill/JISC, 2023), and as germane to institutional and national strategic priorities for the Irish sector and, its community of technological universities.

Authors

Richard Watermeyer is Professor of Higher Education and Co-Director of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations at the University of Bristol. He is by training and orientation a sociologist of higher education; author of well over 100 academic articles, chapters, books and commissioned reports focused on policy and practice challenges and transformations in higher education; and the recipient of research funding for leadership of 19 (inter)national higher education research studies. Richard’s current research focus is on the sociological analyses of digital disruption in global higher education contexts. In this oeuvre he has acted as the Deputy Director of the (£1m) Digital Futures of Work programme (https://digitalfuturesofwork.com) and led an international research team into the effects of digital transitioning and AI adoption in global higher education. Such work has also featured in such analyses of the impacts of generative AI adoption by UK academic researchers (Watermeyer et al. 2024, forthcoming); in recent keynote addresses to the Research in Distance Education and E-Learning and Academic Practice and Technology conferences; and commentary pieces featured by Nature (https://www. nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00115-7) and the LSE (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2024/01/22/if-generative-ai-is-saving-academics-time-what-are-they-doing-with-it/).

Danielle Guizzo is Associate Professor in Economics Education and staff researcher of the Centre for Higher Education Transformations at the University of Bristol. Her research expertise is on the political economy of higher education and the state of academic labour and knowledge production in the light of technological and economic transformations, using a combination of historical and qualitative methods to understand change. Danielle has authored 25 academic articles, co-edited a book and has written several book chapters, reports, and briefs for policymakers. She was awarded the 2024 Clarence E. Ayres scholar award from the Association for Evolutionary Economics for her research on the ceremonialism of higher education from an economic-institutionalist perspective, and has secured research grants as a P-I on the impact of research assessment tools over economics research (funded by the ESRC Rebuilding Macroeconomics Initiative) and as a co-I on how academics have been using technologies in the Covid pandemic (funded by the Royal Economics Society). Danielle has also acted as a consultant for Brazil’s Ministry of Education on the review of Brazil’s national research assessment, and as an Advisory Board member of the Review of the Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics in the UK.

Lara Dzabolova is a PhD researcher at the School of Education at the University of Bristol. Previously, Lara led the Centre for Sustainable Development within the Department of Innovation at a local university in her hometown. Her work was focused on developing sustainability-centred curriculum and research with UN WTO and UN SDSN through digital learning and communication tools.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

Data-driven decision-making is transforming industries like education, healthcare, and finance by harnessing big data and AI. This report explores the critical shift from traditional decision support to AI-powered automation and highlights how these changes impact organisations and society. The report discusses the technology and skills that are currently driving the digital economy and also attempts to reveal what comes next.

Authors

Dr Andrew Pope is a Senior Lecturer and researcher at Cork University Business School, UCC, where he specialises in design and technology. Andrew is Co-Director of the MSc Design and Development of Digital Business and teaches on the MSc Business Analytics programme in UCC. Andrew is the recipient of both the UCC President’s Award for Teaching Excellence and the Irish Academy of Management’s Outstanding Educator Award. Andrew has over 20 years of research experience, collaborating on publicly and privately funded research projects.

Dr Simon Woodworth is a lecturer in Business Information Systems and a Co-Director of the MSc in Business Analytics. He has 15 years’ industry experience in the telecommunications sector, followed by 20 years as an academic. He is Co-Director of the Health Information Systems Research Centre and Lead Investigator in the The Irish Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research. He teaches technical topics including Python Programming, Software Development and Operations and Mobile Application Development. His research interests are focused on Health Informatics and Cyber Security.

Dr Huanhuan Xiong is a lecturer in Information Systems for Sustainable & Responsible Business, and also a senior researcher in Financial Services Innovation Centre, at university College Cork (UCC), Ireland. Currently she serves as a co-director of the MSc Design and Development of Digital Business postgraduate programme. Since 2020, Dr Huanhuan Xiong is the lead researcher in Financial Service Innovation Centre (FSIC), her research areas include but not limited to: big data analytics, decision making, financial well-being, financial resilience.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This report critically examines how the demographic and socio-economic composition of the current and near-future post-compulsory student community intersect with technological, pedagogical, and governance challenges in higher education.

Author

Peter Bryant is a Professor of Business Education and Associate Dean (Education) at the University of Sydney Business School, Australia. He is an award-winning academic with international expertise in designing and delivering successful strategic educational change in both business and social sciences institutions in Australia and the UK. He has thirty years of teaching and research experience in both the UK and Australia at both vocational and higher education levels, in the areas of higher education strategy, educational innovation, online learning and creative industries management.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

This horizon scanning report examines the evolving landscape of academic and institutional integrity in higher education. It traces the historical development of academic and institutional integrity concepts, analyses current international best practices, and forecasts future challenges and opportunities. The report highlights how technological advancements, globalization, and changing educational models have transformed the nature of academic misconduct and institutional responses. Key issues addressed include contract cheating, AI-generated content, and credential fraud. The study synthesizes insights from literature reviews and related documents to provide a comprehensive overview of innovative strategies employed by leading institutions worldwide. These range from integrity-focused curriculum design to generative artificial intelligence.

Authors

Sarah Elaine Eaton is a Professor and research chair at the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary (Canada). She is an award-winning educator, researcher, and leader. She leads transdisciplinary research teams focused on the ethical implications of advanced technology use in educational contexts. Dr. Eaton also holds a concurrent appointment as an Honorary Associate Professor, Deakin University, Australia.

Beatriz Antonieta Moya, Ph.D. in Educational Research from the University of Calgary, specializes in ethics, leadership in higher education, and artificial intelligence. Awarded the 2023 Outstanding Student Award by the European Network for Academic Integrity, her work focuses on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and fostering ethical practices. She has co-authored peer-reviewed publications on academic integrity policy and AI ethics in education and regularly leads workshops and presentations internationally, highlighting her commitment to promoting integrity in higher education through interdisciplinary research and leadership.

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

Generative AI (GAI) presents significant challenges and opportunities to the higher education sector, from the threat to academic integrity to the promise of personalised learning at scale. This report focuses on three key areas: the impact of GAI on current teaching and assessment practices, current applications and the shift to more learner- centred approaches; emerging GAI pedagogy, international best practices and early research findings on risks; and GAI and digital transformation, international regulation and the future skills agenda.

Author
Mairéad Pratschke is Visiting Professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Data Science Institute (DSI); and Research Fellow and Advisory Board member at the USA’s National Science Foundation-funded National AI Institute for Adult Education and Online Learning (AI-ALOE). Author of Generative AI and Education (2024), Mairéad has delivered keynote talks on generative AI and education in Ireland, the UK, Canada, the USA, Lebanon, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, South Africa and Singapore.

Author website: https://maireadpratschke.com/

Commissioned by the N-TUTORR National Digital Leadership Network.

While Generative AI technologies have existed for many years, recent rapid advances in the field have pushed these technologies into mainstream use across society. As higher education institutions grappled with these new technologies, initial responses focused on potentially significant threats to academic integrity. However, as our understandings have evolved, there is an increasing awareness that these developing technologies also present opportunities for teaching, learning, assessment and research in higher education.

Against this rapidly evolving backdrop, we in the Centre for Academic Practice (Trinity College Dublin) found ourselves faced with new challenges. How could we best support our educators to respond to the challenges of GenAI? How might we influence and support strategic initiatives and policy development regarding GenAI for teaching, learning and assessment at the institutional level? Conscious that our colleagues across the sector were facing similar challenges, we decided to initiate a cross-institutional collaboration with teaching and learning leaders from across the sector, where we could tackle this together!

This workbook takes the student on a conceptual journey aiding their understanding of what is meant by the quantitative-qualitative research process in contemporary legal empirical research. Although, of interest to social science students, the particular worked examples relate to how to do research on law, legal policy and review.

This is a short introduction to ChatGPT for people teaching in higher education, created in January 2023 and updated until this version was saved in February 2023. The resource is a slide deck which you are free to modify and update (since this is a fast-moving topic). No prior knowledge of AI or chatbots is necessary to use the slides.

A brief showcase of existing MTU Crawford initiatives that nurture wellness within teaching and learning, followed by an online talk and Q&A, delivered by Rhonda Schaller (Pratt Institute, Brooklyn). Rhonda is a Fulbright Specialist in contemplative and wellbeing pedagogy.

The DkIT Embedding Employability project represents the latest step in the Institute’s commitment to our graduates’ employability. Funded by the National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, as part of their SATLE Fund 2019, the project has offered staff, students, and employers an opportunity to exchange employability best practice.

In this special publication, colleagues from across the Connacht Ulster Alliance (CUA), including GMIT, IT Sligo and LYIT, share insights and innovations on their teaching and learning practice over the last 18 months. Many will touch on their experiences of adapting to remote learning and teaching during COVID, and also reflect on lessons learnt and plans for the future. The DigitalEd.ie Knowledge Platform forms part of the iNOTE project, funded by the Higher Education Authority (HEA) Ireland.