A resource highlighting the potential of digital technologies to support Readiness Assurance Tests in team-based learning (TBL).
Benefit of this resource and how to make the best use of it
The traditional approach to the roll out of the Individual Readiness Assurance test is a “paper and pen” approach. This can result in reams of paper being used (question sheets and answer forms all need to be printed). An obvious benefit of students having access to their own devices in college is that these can be used for the Readiness Assurance Test phase and the use of paper can be reduced. Quizzing tools such as Moodle Quiz, MS Forms, Turning Technologies and Vevox can reduce the reliance on paper. But apart from reduced paper usage what are some of the other benefits that digital technologies provide? This resource provides an overview of these benefits.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA license, allowing sharing and adaptation for non-commercial use with proper attribution, provided derivative works use the same license.
?
This citation is automatically generated and may require adjustment. Always verify it against your style guide.
Athlone Institute of Technology (2021). Facilitating tbl – tools to succeed: readiness assurance tests. National Resource Hub (Ireland). Retrieved from: https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/resource/facilitating-tbl-tools-to-succeed-readiness-assurance-tests/ License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA).
Adapting this resource? Share your version!
If you have modified or adopted this resource, share your version here. Tracking adaptations helps us measure impact and connects others with useful updates.
This report draws on Patricia Gibson’s research around critical approaches to Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education and the increasing automation of Educational Technologies (EdTech).
This resource was created to share the learning from teaching adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) in IADT college as part of a national suite of pilot projects.
Comparing student and educator perceptions of generative artificial intelligence for teaching, learning and assessment: results from two institutional surveys