Are You AI Ready? Investigating AI Tools in Higher Education – Student Guide

Creator(s)

SATLE 'Are You AI Ready?' Project Team, University College Dublin

Organisation(s)

Discipline(s)

Education, Information and Communication Technologies, Teaching & Learning

Topic(s)

Digital Learning, Student Success

License

CC BY-NC

Media Format

Date Submitted

Submitted by

Export Resource Data

Description

This self-directed resource has been designed to help students navigate and understand the basics of GenAI. Exploring the resource at their own pace will give students an opportunity to focus on understanding some fundamental GenAI concepts, while also considering the pros and cons of using GenAI in their studies.

Benefit of this resource and how to make the best use of it

The self-directed GenAI resource offers numerous benefits, including development of a comprehensive understanding of AI principles, enhanced critical thinking skills, flexibility in learning pace, and practical skill development through experimentation with different GenAI models and tools.
The resource is structured in four sections which are:

1. Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence

Serving as an non-technical overview, this section defines key AI-related terminology, identifies the major GenAI models and tools, and outlines foundational GenAI competencies students need to develop and apply, when deciding whether or not to use GenAI in their studies.

2. Generative AI Tools

This section ‘Generative AI Tools’ gives an overview of some of the most common GenAI tools currently available, how to register for & access these tools, and the basics of getting started using each tool.

3. Learning With Generative AI

The aim of this section of the module is to help students understand the potential of GenAI to enhance their learning experience. GenAI tools can support knowledge acquisition, retention, and application, by providing personalised learning aids and innovative study methods. For example, tools can be used to generate custom flashcards, summarise complex texts, or create practice problems to support and reinforce learning. By mastering the use of GenAI prompts and applying critical thinking to the outputs, students can maximise the educational benefits while minimizing the potential risks associated with using GenAI in their studies.

4. Important Considerations Before Using GenAI In Your Studies

This section offers guidance to help students responsibly and effectively navigate the integration of GenAI into their studies.

This project has been funded by the Strategic Alignment of Teaching and Learning Enhancement funding administered by the National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, in partnership with the Higher Education Authority.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC license, permitting sharing and adaptation for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
? This citation is automatically generated and may require adjustment. Always verify it against your style guide.
Team, S. '. Y. A. R. P., & Dublin, U. C. (2024). Are you ai ready? investigating ai tools in higher education – student guide. National Resource Hub (Ireland). Retrieved from: https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/resource/are-you-ai-ready-investigating-ai-tools-in-higher-education-student-guide/ License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC).

Adapting this resource? Share your version!

If you have modified or adopted this resource, share your version here. Tracking adaptations helps us measure impact and connects others with useful updates.

Related OER

The Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education is a living resource for educators, students, and institutions. It invites reflection and dialogue across thirty statements exploring teaching, ethics, and imagination – helping higher education navigate AI with curiosity, integrity, and humanity.

In 2024/25 research was undertaken in higher education institutions in Ireland to explore commuter students’ experiences and to consider changes that would improve their experiences and outcomes. It addressed the questions: i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in higher education institutions in Ireland? ii. How can higher education institutions improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students? The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Commuter students generally found the experience of commuting to be quite negative, with few advantages. Furthermore, they felt their on-campus experience is not designed to facilitate their engagement. Students find that the organisation and delivery of the academic experience does not accommodate their needs, and they have few opportunities to engage with the wider student experience.

In Ireland around 40% of students remain in the family home – with their parents, partner or children – while participating in higher education (HE) and commute to their higher education institution (HEI). In 2024-25, the Technological Higher Education Association, now the Technological Universities Association (TUA) and the N-TUTORR Student Empowerment project leadership team, worked in partnership with Professor Liz Thomas, University of York. This resulted in an innovative project to explore commuter students’ experiences in Irish HEIs, and to consider changes that would improve the experience and outcomes for commuter students.

This Irish study builds on qualitative research undertaken in the UK (Thomas & Jones 2017). This found that commuter students are poorly defined, but self-identified commuters experienced commuting to be more tiring, stressful, and expensive than they imagined. They also reported lower engagement in some elements of the academic experience, and in the enhancement and social domains. Available secondary evidence finds that commuter student status is often correlated with not only poorer engagement but also lower outcomes, such as continuation, completion, attainment, and progression to graduate employment.

The study reported here addressed the following two questions:
i. How does being a commuter student impact on student experiences and outcomes in technological HEIs in Ireland
ii. How can technological HEIs improve the experience and outcomes of commuter students?

The study combined a semi-structured review and thematic analysis of the websites of the seven technological HEIs in Ireland, with two online ‘town hall focus groups’ (THFGs) involving 33 participants: six staff and 27 students, eight of whom were trained as facilitators and ‘jurors’ to reflect on the evidence heard. The THFGs addressed the key research questions, collecting individual responses via an online form; small groups discussed the topics and then a commuter student facilitator reported key points from their discussion into the main room. Ethical approval was secured from the University of York and participating HEIs.