Generative AI Guidance Microsite provides resources and guidance to staff and students on the appropriate use of Generative AI in teaching and learning at MIC.
Benefit of this resource and how to make the best use of it
These guidelines cover a host of topics including:
Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
Overview of the technologies’ possibilities and limitations
Outline of what acceptable use might look like for staff and students
Tips and guidance on how Generative AI can appropriately be incorporated in everyday use at MIC
Examples of Generative AI infringements
Considerations for grading in the context of GenAI
Glossary of key terms
These resources are intended to help staff and students navigate their use of Generative AI in a teaching and learning context
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license, permitting redistribution for non-commercial use with proper attribution but prohibiting modifications.
?
This citation is automatically generated and may require adjustment. Always verify it against your style guide.
MIC, L. (16/09/2025). Generative ai guidance microsite. National Resource Hub (Ireland). Retrieved from: https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/resource/generative-ai-guidance-microsite/ License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND).
Adapting this resource? Share your version!
If you have modified or adopted this resource, share your version here. Tracking adaptations helps us measure impact and connects others with useful updates.
This resource was created to share the learning from teaching adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) in IADT college as part of a national suite of pilot projects.
This case study outlines a first-year intervention at SETU Waterford using a timetabled weekly session to tackle common causes of academic failure such as time management, assessment planning. and study skills. It is intended for programme teams seeking practical, low-resource approaches to improving student progression and retention.
This OER presents findings from a comparative study of novice programmers engaging in face-to-face and hybrid pair programming. It explores collaboration patterns, role switching, satisfaction, and challenges, offering evidence-based insights for educators seeking to prepare students for effective teamwork in modern hybrid software development.