Student success at college is not just achieving high grades The National Forum for Teaching and Learning defines student success as the process by which students fulfil their potential and flourish at college and in society. This is a broader activity than simply achieving high grades. Psychosocial competencies are core to the definition of student success: these are the ‘soft skills’ or ‘non-cognitive skills’ that enable students to cope well with learning challenges, engage deeply in learning, and develop their identities as learners and as active citizens. Transitions are a key issue within this priority area, with transitions such as the move from school to college presenting both challenges and opportunities for students.
About this initiative
Supervisors play a pivotal role in supporting students on the research journey (Kiley, 2011). Despite this, many supervisors do not have a clear supervision pedagogy (Paré, 2011; Amundsen and McAlpine, 2011). Rather, they rely on perceived disciplinary norms, ‘on-the-job’ learning or on their own doctoral experiences (Amundsen and McAlpine, 2011; Kiley, 2011; Aitchinson et al, 2012; González-Ocampo and Castelló, 2018). Moreover, while some UK HEIs offer mandatory training in supervision, in Ireland, CPD in this area tends to be more ad hoc. The consequences of this are two-fold: firstly, once-off training sessions do not necessarily foster deep levels of engagement between supervisors, which is needed if supervisors are to examine their own approaches (Lee, 2007) or create a community of practice. Secondly, short training sessions do not necessarily facilitate a lasting change in practice (Winstone and Boud, 2019). Using a human-centred design process, this initiative will co-create a digital system with and for research supervisors from Institute of Technology Carlow, Waterford Institute of Technology and other Higher Education Institutions, that will provide them with opportunities for deliberate, scaffolded practice (Eriksson and Pool, 2016) in supervision skills. The proposed digital system will enable them to self-review their supervisory practices and compare these with the reviews of experienced peers and mentors. It will also allow them to monitor their skills over time. Upon design, the system could be integrated into existing training (e.g. Level 9 – Certificate in Research Supervision) and will promote ongoing collaboration between supervisors following the training, thereby strengthening communities of practice.




